<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McKinsey&#8217;s &#8216;insight&#8217; into the airline industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eire.com/2003/mckinseys-insight-into-the-airline-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eire.com/2003/mckinseys-insight-into-the-airline-industry/</link>
	<description>Saving the Internet from Fraud, Pornography, and Cranks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2003/mckinseys-insight-into-the-airline-industry/comment-page-1/#comment-5060</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/wordpress/?p=45#comment-5060</guid>
		<description>First of all, I 100% agree with your assessment of the fundamental difference between low cost carriers and mainline carriers.  Add to your assessment the fact that mainline carriers increasingly &quot;depend&quot; upon price-stimulated leisure traffic to keep the seats full and back-fill the excess capacity created by business-focused frequency plays, and it&#039;s not hard to understand why the mainline carriers are so vulnerable to LCC competition.  

That said, I don&#039;t think you read the article, and your attack of it weakens your otherwise strong case. The article does not lay out a &quot;case&quot; for why mainline carriers need to address their cost structures (with this much, I, and, presumably, your Granny, agree).  Instead, it offers some new insights into &quot;how&quot;.  The authors of the article contend that airline management (in its signular focus on factor costs) has failed to recognize that much of the cost structure is driven by &quot;how&quot; airlines execute basic daily operational tasks.  This is a process-intensive, labor-intensive, capital-intensive industry.  The authors believe that &quot;process excellence&quot; has the potential to both reduce cost and increase quality.  Other companies in similar situations (Disney, McDonalds, Toyota) focus much of their efforts on refining processes to ensure maximum output from each labor or capital input.  The authors, I think, put some compelling examples on the table of how airlines might further reduce costs (and increase quality) without simply slashing wages.  

Certainly the case for business-model reform remains.  But add the right business model reforms to a capability-driven 10% cost advantage, and you&#039;d have an airline that might just survive the low cost onslaught

Read the article again.

AD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I 100% agree with your assessment of the fundamental difference between low cost carriers and mainline carriers.  Add to your assessment the fact that mainline carriers increasingly &#8220;depend&#8221; upon price-stimulated leisure traffic to keep the seats full and back-fill the excess capacity created by business-focused frequency plays, and it&#8217;s not hard to understand why the mainline carriers are so vulnerable to LCC competition.  </p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t think you read the article, and your attack of it weakens your otherwise strong case. The article does not lay out a &#8220;case&#8221; for why mainline carriers need to address their cost structures (with this much, I, and, presumably, your Granny, agree).  Instead, it offers some new insights into &#8220;how&#8221;.  The authors of the article contend that airline management (in its signular focus on factor costs) has failed to recognize that much of the cost structure is driven by &#8220;how&#8221; airlines execute basic daily operational tasks.  This is a process-intensive, labor-intensive, capital-intensive industry.  The authors believe that &#8220;process excellence&#8221; has the potential to both reduce cost and increase quality.  Other companies in similar situations (Disney, McDonalds, Toyota) focus much of their efforts on refining processes to ensure maximum output from each labor or capital input.  The authors, I think, put some compelling examples on the table of how airlines might further reduce costs (and increase quality) without simply slashing wages.  </p>
<p>Certainly the case for business-model reform remains.  But add the right business model reforms to a capability-driven 10% cost advantage, and you&#8217;d have an airline that might just survive the low cost onslaught</p>
<p>Read the article again.</p>
<p>AD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
