<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electronic voting: new report expected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eire.com/2004/electronic-voting-new-report-expected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eire.com/2004/electronic-voting-new-report-expected/</link>
	<description>Saving the Internet from Fraud, Pornography, and Cranks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Colm MacCarthaigh</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2004/electronic-voting-new-report-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-9579</link>
		<dc:creator>Colm MacCarthaigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/wordpress/?p=95#comment-9579</guid>
		<description>The new electoral act was passed through its final stage in the Seanad on Wednesday, but the earliest the President could sign it is Tuesday - after the 5 day minimum period for consideration has passed.

Additionally it&#039;s now not clear, despite the opinion of the Commission that the full details of its work &quot;would make a significant contribution to the information about the chosen system that is available generally in the context of the public debate&quot;, whether the Commission now even wants to make a full report.

The commission secretariat are saying they have not been told to expect a report. My advice; Ring them on monday, on 01 6184833, and ask (politely) that the Commission be asked to publish a full report as soon as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new electoral act was passed through its final stage in the Seanad on Wednesday, but the earliest the President could sign it is Tuesday &#8211; after the 5 day minimum period for consideration has passed.</p>
<p>Additionally it&#8217;s now not clear, despite the opinion of the Commission that the full details of its work &#8220;would make a significant contribution to the information about the chosen system that is available generally in the context of the public debate&#8221;, whether the Commission now even wants to make a full report.</p>
<p>The commission secretariat are saying they have not been told to expect a report. My advice; Ring them on monday, on 01 6184833, and ask (politely) that the Commission be asked to publish a full report as soon as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoin O Lachtnain</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2004/electronic-voting-new-report-expected/comment-page-1/#comment-9580</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoin O Lachtnain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/wordpress/?p=95#comment-9580</guid>
		<description>Excuse me, I thought there had been a motion for earlier signature, but a careful search reveals there hasn&#039;t.

I do have some information on this, but we&#039;ll see.

a.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, I thought there had been a motion for earlier signature, but a careful search reveals there hasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I do have some information on this, but we&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>a.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
