<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE Domain Registry &#8211; the government consults</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/</link>
	<description>Government, Infrastructure, Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:06:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lex Ferenda &#187; Dot IE and the Communications Regulation (Amendment) Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/comment-page-1/#comment-91793</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex Ferenda &#187; Dot IE and the Communications Regulation (Amendment) Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/2006/01/07/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/#comment-91793</guid>
		<description>[...] There seems to be some confusion over the provisions in the Communications Regulation (Amendment) Bill 2007. While - as promised in the Electronic Communications (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2005 consultation (good post at the time by Antóin - the law on domain names in Ireland is being updated, very little of this is novel - and most of the sections being discussed have been on the books since the Electronic Commerce Act 2000 (Section 31), and are merely being reorganised. The 2000 Act provided that the Minister could take the .ie registry under his/her control; the 2005/6 consultation proposed substituting ComReg for the Minister. This new Bill does the same, but with slightly different wording - and that&#8217;s what&#8217;s causing the confusion. I do believe this legislation (and the process surrounding it) is interesting, but for different reasons. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There seems to be some confusion over the provisions in the Communications Regulation (Amendment) Bill 2007. While &#8211; as promised in the Electronic Communications (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2005 consultation (good post at the time by Antóin &#8211; the law on domain names in Ireland is being updated, very little of this is novel &#8211; and most of the sections being discussed have been on the books since the Electronic Commerce Act 2000 (Section 31), and are merely being reorganised. The 2000 Act provided that the Minister could take the .ie registry under his/her control; the 2005/6 consultation proposed substituting ComReg for the Minister. This new Bill does the same, but with slightly different wording &#8211; and that&#8217;s what&#8217;s causing the confusion. I do believe this legislation (and the process surrounding it) is interesting, but for different reasons. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/comment-page-1/#comment-29248</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/2006/01/07/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/#comment-29248</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve briefly explained how the old pricing system worked vs the new one:
http://www.mneylon.com/blog/archives/2006/02/13/iedr-should-engage-with-public/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve briefly explained how the old pricing system worked vs the new one:<br />
<a href="http://www.mneylon.com/blog/archives/2006/02/13/iedr-should-engage-with-public/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mneylon.com/blog/archives/2006/02/13/iedr-should-engage-with-public/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/comment-page-1/#comment-28631</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/2006/01/07/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/#comment-28631</guid>
		<description>Maybe they don&#039;t agree with me, but anyone complaining is probably charging more than they really need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they don&#8217;t agree with me, but anyone complaining is probably charging more than they really need to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/comment-page-1/#comment-28512</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/2006/01/07/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/#comment-28512</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately not everyone in the business agrees with you. 

While we are on the subject, what is the wholesale price of a domain now and what was it before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately not everyone in the business agrees with you. </p>
<p>While we are on the subject, what is the wholesale price of a domain now and what was it before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/comment-page-1/#comment-28505</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/2006/01/07/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/#comment-28505</guid>
		<description>The wholesale rates and other matters that you mention were discussed with the IE resellers at length prior to being implemented. 
I don&#039;t see how anyone could take issue with the new wholesale rates, as they now lower than ever before and uniform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wholesale rates and other matters that you mention were discussed with the IE resellers at length prior to being implemented.<br />
I don&#8217;t see how anyone could take issue with the new wholesale rates, as they now lower than ever before and uniform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il mondo dei tld e dei nomi a dominio</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/comment-page-1/#comment-28332</link>
		<dc:creator>Il mondo dei tld e dei nomi a dominio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/2006/01/07/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/#comment-28332</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Registrazione domini IE - consultazione del governo&lt;/strong&gt;

Il governo Irlandese ha rilasciato una proposta per la regolazione delle registrazioni di domini .IE.
Scrive a questo riguardo Antoin O Lachtnain su eire.com.
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Registrazione domini IE &#8211; consultazione del governo</strong></p>
<p>Il governo Irlandese ha rilasciato una proposta per la regolazione delle registrazioni di domini .IE.<br />
Scrive a questo riguardo Antoin O Lachtnain su eire.com.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan B</title>
		<link>http://www.eire.com/2006/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/comment-page-1/#comment-26401</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eire.com/2006/01/07/ie-domain-registry-the-government-consults/#comment-26401</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been coming for the last few years. There was an effort albeit disjointed from the Internet community it was all just ignored.  

The announcement of price reductions seems a little timely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been coming for the last few years. There was an effort albeit disjointed from the Internet community it was all just ignored.  </p>
<p>The announcement of price reductions seems a little timely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

